Evidence

What personalized cancer vaccines have already shown, across peptide, DNA and mRNA platforms

Immune response is common across the field, and several trials show encouraging signals: multi-year survival follow-up, longer survival than matched controls in early glioblastoma data, and objective responses in melanoma. Making that durability consistent, trial to trial, is what better target selection is for.

What this page is, and isn't

This is the field's comparator evidence: published trial results from other groups' vaccine programs, researched to establish where the science already stands. See our FAQ page for where the company's own regulatory process stands today.

Peptide, DNA and mRNA Vaccines

Real trials, across every delivery platform

TrialVaccine typePersonalizedPhaseCancer typeResponseRead
PGV001 (Mount Sinai)PeptideYesPh1Multiple cancers (adjuvant)Immune response in all 11 patients who completed treatment; 6 of 13 alive at 5 years (3 cancer-free)Peptide plus poly-ICLC; single arm
NeoVax (Dana-Farber)PeptideYesPh1GlioblastomaMedian overall survival 36.9 vs 25.3 months (MGMT-methylated) and 19.0 vs 16.7 months (MGMT-unmethylated), versus matched controlsPeptide plus poly-ICLC, given with pembrolizumab; matched institutional controls, not randomized; conference abstract
GNOS-PV01 (Geneos)DNA plasmidYesPh1Glioblastoma (MGMT-unmethylated)12-month overall survival 66.7% (6 of 9); median overall survival 16.3 monthsPersonalized DNA plasmid, not a peptide vaccine; single arm
EVX-01 (Evaxion)PeptideYesPh1/2MelanomaPhase 1: 67% objective response (8 of 12), including 2 complete responses. Phase 2: 75% (12 of 16), including 4 complete responsesGiven with pembrolizumab; Phase 2 is company-reported, not yet peer reviewed
mRNA-4157 / V940 (Moderna, Merck)mRNAYesPh2bMelanoma (adjuvant)44% lower risk of recurrence or death at about 2 years (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.02; 157 patients); 49% lower at 5 yearsmRNA, not a peptide vaccine; the Phase 3 INTerpath-001 trial met its recurrence-free survival endpoint, full results pending
iTAC-XS15-CLL01 (Tübingen)PeptideYesPh1Chronic lymphocytic leukemiaT-cell response in 95% of patients (19 of 20); 84% sustained at 6 months (16 of 19)Personalized peptides plus XS15 adjuvant, given with a BTK inhibitor; measured immune response, not efficacy
PolyPEPI1018 (Treos Bio)PeptideNoPh1bColorectal cancer (MSS, metastatic)27% objective response (3 of 11); median progression-free survival 12.5 months with multiple doses (6 patients) vs 4.6 months with one dose (5 patients)Off the shelf (7 shared antigens), given with maintenance chemotherapy
UCPVax (Besançon University Hospital)PeptideNoPh2Glioblastoma (MGMT-unmethylated)Anti-telomerase immune response in 97% (29 of 30); median overall survival 17.9 months (31 patients)Off the shelf (shared telomerase antigen); single-arm first cohort; conference abstract

A note on Mount Sinai

PGV001 was run at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York. That is a separate institution from Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, the company's academic sequencing partner. See Team & Partners. The shared name is a coincidence worth flagging clearly.

The Field-Wide Pattern

Immune response is common. Consistency is the open question.

80 to 100%
of patients developed an immune response across the five peptide trials above that report patient-level rates (small Phase 1 and 2 studies)

Not every trial in this field succeeds. This page is meant to stay evidence based rather than cherry picked. The field has real, well documented setbacks alongside its wins, and that context matters.

See how NSP targets this gap